NYC Summer Kick-off @ The Frying Pan!

Magnetic’s Summer Bash is back!

Start off the summer aboard the best boat in Manhattan –  NYC’s historic Frying Pan lightship, docked at Pier 66 Maritime. Join us for a night of good music, an open bar, food and amazing views of the Hudson!

**This is a private, invitation only event limited to agencies and brand marketers. If you are an agency or a brand, you can request an invite by emailing events@magnetic.com. Full name, email, title and company are required to receive an invitation (agencies & brands only).**

FryingPan_Invite

 

 

 

20 Agency Folks Describe Their Alternative-Career Fantasies

What happens when you ask 20 influential individuals working in PR, media, and advertising about their alternative-career fantasies? When AdAge posed this question, they received an array of responses ranging from Michael Ventura’s (Founder & CEO of Sub Rosa) choice of shaman to Jason Peterson’s (chief creative officer at Havas Worldwide) bike messenger dreams. Some would be lawyers, others novelists, and, on a slightly more specific path, Chris Adams (creative director, Saatchi & Saatchi LA) would be: “The guy that goes on tour with Radiohead and keeps their instruments just slightly out of tune.” Magnetic CEO James Green revealed that he has already lived part of his alternative-career fantasy, and managed to impart what he learned from the experience:

“If I were not in advertising, I’d likely be running some other start-up. I love thinking of new ideas, challenging the status quo, growing organizations and seeing them flourish. But if for some reason I was unable to secure an entrepreneurial job — I would probably choose to be a sailor. In fact, I have already been one — albeit for a short period of time. A few years ago, I decided to sell every item I own — I should actually say we decided — because I’m married with two kids. So if it didn’t fit in a 5 feet x 5 feet storage facility, it was sold or discarded. We then bought a boat and went sailing for a year. Lessons learned? No matter how insane, if you really want to do something, you really really should do it. And if rules, schedules or family suggest otherwise, you need to break the rules and the schedules and persuade the family of the virtue of following your dreams. If you come back, you’ll be better for it.”

The interests of these industry leaders may span a broad range, but all of their alternative careers reflect their fundamentally creative, dynamic, and outgoing personalities.

Click here for the full article from AdAge!

 

Integral Ad Science Announces Industry’s First Pre-Bid Fraud Detection Solution

Integral Ad Science, the technology company dedicated to ensuring brand safe and high quality media environments, recently announced that its programmatic pre-bid solution for online advertising fraud is now available via AppNexus and Turn as well as other leading companies including search retargeting leader Magnetic.

Integral’s Suspicious Activity Detection product, released in 2012, scores web pages to determine the risk of fraudulent or deceptive activity, and blocks ads before they appear on highly suspicious pages.  The latest solution and integration with partners now enables brands and marketers to leverage predictive data in a programmatic pre-bid environment, to avoid bidding on fraudulent or highly suspicious inventory.

Integral’s solution helps prevent click fraud, attribution fraud, and impression fraud, activities that, in conjunction, have been cited as a $400M annual problem. Integral’s suspicious activity technology encompasses analyses of each individual ad call (approximately two billion per day), and its solutions assess real-time signals, cumulative evidence–leveraging over four years of technology, data science and machine learning capabilities, and predictive insights.

Will Luttrell, CTO of Integral Ad Science, believes this solution to be more effective than forms of published fraud reports, which would notify the actors that they have been caught, prompting them to simply change domains and continue with fraudulent activity.

Earlier this year, Magnetic’s CEO James Green published an article called “The Darker Side of Viewability,” covering the topic of fraudulent traffic.

While it is critical to understand how we have become victims, it is equally important to figuring out how marketers can improve the situation:

Focus on attribution: If you run sophisticated attribution models, which ads are working vs. which ads are not will become apparent. In the end, bots don’t buy widgets. With the help of Google, Adobe, C3 Metrics and Adometry, we’ve been running a series called Attribution Revolution to help educate marketers.

Use viewability products:  Most viewability products really work.

Find credible exchanges and reward the good guys: If you are a buyer on RTB, figure out which exchanges contain more “suspicious traffic” and move your buys to those that have less. Explain the issue to the suspicious exchanges;  if the problem is fixed, you can always move traffic back.

Don’t believe the unbelievable: If the biggest players in the industry cannot come close to matching the results of some of the smaller players on your campaign, then those results are probably too good to be true

FBX Opens The News Feed: Blurring The Line Between Content And Advertising

As the Internet continues to democratize media, the line between reporting and advertising (or paid-for content)becomes increasingly blurred. Making the gray area even grayer, Facebook recently announced that it will begin placing ads purchased through its ad exchange, Facebook Exchange (FBX), into the News Feeds of users.

Marketers now have a real-time opportunity to enter people’s online lives in a capacity that was previously off-limits, aided by Facebook’s real-time bidding. Brands that already understand data-driven marketing and smart programmatic buying will be able to take advantage of this immediately, while other brands and agencies may need to scramble to create assets to fit the RTB model.

With the new “closeness” to consumers afforded by ads entering the News Feed, marketers must be careful to keep content meaningful and relevant. A deluge of irrelevant ads will make it difficult to deliver performance, prove their value, and maintain rate. But if there is demand for limited supply, and if the ads are relevant, then the auction factor could play a huge role in building the value of these placements.

Inviting advertisers to enter the Facebook News Feed is yet another step toward combining paid and earned media, which makes the need for relevancy and the smart use of data more important than ever.

Click here to read the full article from MediaPost!

Kicking Third-Party Cookies To The Curb: The Fallout For The Digital Ad Industry

With the latest announcement that Firefox is blocking the use of third-party cookies by default, marketers, ad technology companies and ad agencies have been forced to consider alternative strategies for reaching consumers with targeted advertising.

Safari was the first to move against third-party cookies, but the controversy heightened when other browsers followed suit. Even more troubling is that on mobile – the fastest growing Internet access method — iOS/Safari has over 60% market share.

Cookies are not used for insidious purposes. They are crucial to helping advertisers effectively track performance and targeting. They also benefit users who can dump them and begin anew. However, if cookies go away, it doesn’t mean that the ability to target and measure digital ads will go away as well. Digital advertising is a $40 billion industry in the U.S. alone, and about half of that spend requires using third-party cookies to locate and target relevant consumers. If all third-party cookies are banned, advertisers and the digital industry will simply be in a position to figure out other ways to reach consumers with relevant ad messages.

As traffic shifts more and more to mobile devices, the industry will need to devise various ways to identify each of these devices to anonymously target relevant users—like Apple’s proprietary version of the cookie: The Apple ID for Advertisers. Whatever this technology is, it will end up being adopted on “desktops” and all other devices that access the Internet, but it will be more difficult for the consumer to control.

Companies like Mozilla, Microsoft, and Apple are not, in fact, helping the user. With each browser setting different standards and approaches, combined with the growth of tablet and other smartphone usage, users will find themselves moving from a simple life where they knew what was going on and had control  in their hands, to having their control fractured into a myriad of inconsistent choices.

Read the full article from Marketing Land here!

Four Real-Time Questions About Real-Time Bidding

With the rise of the Facebook Exchange, and predictions of a 59% growth in RTB spend by 2016, real-time bidding continues to prove itself an important force in the advertising world. As inventory sources, audience data and creative opportunities expand, here are four most pressing questions facing RTB:

1.    How will RTB continue to grow over time? What are the contributing factors to growth?

In the future, almost all advertising buys will be contracted through exchanges, and ads will be delivered through an exchange platform. RTB provides scale, efficiency, and reliability at a lower cost and with fewer people involved than current methods. Additionally, RTB allows advertisers to control and monitor all the aspects of data across an entire buy. It’s largely due to the wide adoption of site and search retargeting that RTB has experienced and continues to experience such widespread growth.

2.    Are more branding dollars really moving into RTB territory, and why?

Although TV is still a much larger platform for brand advertisers, digital is the largest growing form of brand advertising. Digital dollars are moving to RTB because it provides a place for advertisers to experiment with data, test different strategies, gain audience insights, and see what works best for their campaigns.

3.    What does FBX mean for the future of biddable media?

One important benefit of FBX is the security that it offers advertisers of knowing exactly where their ad will run: on Facebook. In the future, however, when all digital media will be made available via exchanges, FBX will be just another player in the marketplace. FBX is a great example of how retargeting and RTB go hand in hand.

4.    Are private exchanges really beneficial for buyers and sellers?

Yes. The benefit of private exchanges is that both the buyer and seller know who they are working with. This allows the seller to maintain an “exclusive” element to his inventory because not everyone has access to it; in return, a direct relationship allows the buyer to know exactly where his ads are going to run.

Click here to read the full article from MediaPost.

POV: Interview with James Green

Tell us about Magnetic and its inception. What differentiates it from other search retargeting companies?

Billions of searches are happening around the Web each month, creating valuable audience data for brands and marketers alike. Magnetic provides brands with the opportunity to reach consumers who are searching in their product category at multiple stages of the consumer funnel by leveraging intent and interest-based search activity. You can think of it as behavioral targeting on steroids: Instead of targeting people based on where they’ve been, we target them based on what they’re looking for.

Magnetic was the first company to focus 100 percent on search retargeting. Although we offer site retargeting as well, we remain one of the only companies to focus primarily on search retargeting.

Part of Magnetic’s “secret sauce” is our proprietary keyword generation tool. This allows us to automatically identify millions of relevant keywords, thus greatly increasing scale and reach across display media.

Can you give us a quick overview of how search and site retargeting differ? How can they be used in tandem for an increase in results?

Search and site retargeting are entirely different. In fact, it’s a great shame that they share the word retargeting. Site retargeting is a way for you to effectively remarket to your existing customers and/or people who have visited your brand website or online store. Alternatively, search retargeting is the best way to reach people who are interested in your product category and/or brand but may or may not be aware of your particular offering and certainly have not visited your site. Therefore, search retargeting is higher up the “purchase funnel” than site retargeting, yet it still reaches consumers within the consideration phase. Think of it as the difference between maximizing return on existing customers (site retargeting) and acquiring new customers (search retargeting).

We started to offer site retargeting to clients a few years ago because it complements search retargeting, and therefore it made sense for clients to use Magnetic for both their site and search retargeting needs. Using the same company for both makes it simpler to manage who should receive credit for converting a customer — a practice known as attribution.

Why should brands and advertisers invest in search retargeting?

Search retargeting is a way to extend one’s search marketing efforts and expand display campaigns to bring in new customers. In the end, search retargeting will result in a greater ROI than demographic, psychographic or behavioral targeting because you are reaching people who have specifically indicated that they are searching for what you sell.

This year, researchers and vendors have adopted a standard that only counts viewable impressions. Why is this important? What problems do you foresee with these standards for advertisers and publishers?

I believe that the viewable impression movement is the most important initiative in digital advertising today. Tracking viewable impressions breaks down into two halves:

  1. Ad placement: It’s great to be sure that the ad you are buying is above the fold or in the window that a consumer will be viewing. Therefore, standards around this will help brands ensure that they are paying for what they really want. However, this is the less important part of the initiative.
  2. Traffic quality: There are many impressions on ad exchanges (places where you buy ads in real time) that are generated by robots and technology that is developed to seem as though it’s real and performs with a high click-through rate. However, many of these impressions are never seen by a human. This is the second and vastly more important part of the viewability initiative: making sure that every impression is a real impression, seen by a real person, on a clean, well-lit website. This is absolutely crucial for the success of our business, and there are already a variety of tools that have been released by companies such as Integral Ad Science and spider.io to help us get there.

The less obvious reason why viewability is so important is that if you have one or two people in a basement producing impressions that seem legit but are priced well below market value and a buyer is unable to determine the difference between these “legitimate” impressions, then the market price that a publisher can sell ads for will be reduced. This will mean that the publisher will have less money to invest in content, and, as a result, ad environments will be less appealing — leading to even less money for publishers. So before you know it, you’ve got a downward spiral of revenue and quality.

What are some tips for advertisers who hope to use retargeting effectively?

First and most importantly, make sure you understand the difference between the various flavors of retargeting. Next, ensure that you have a way to judge the value of different marketing efforts. Each effort should have a different break-even point. For example, you’re going to spend more money to obtain a new customer than to upsell an existing customer. Lastly, don’t follow your gut. Use an attribution model and follow the numbers.

How has the evolution of big data affected how marketers can reach the right person with the right message?

Big data is simply more information, and the amount of data that is available to us is mind-boggling. The best way to figure out what to do with it is to start at the place where you have the largest return, and then only focus on that one place. Ignore data that doesn’t inform the decision that you’re currently working on. Talk to people about how they can find out about your product and how they can convert. Next, look at the data that’s available to you and focus on what you don’t know. If you know what it costs to get someone to your site but you don’t know how or why they convert once they get there, then focus on that until you do. The right message to the right person at the right time depends on who they are, where they are and how you reach them. So, these messages will change even when dealing with the same customer. Big data is the key to understanding the best way to communicate with your customers at every stage of the purchase funnel.

Why should brands/marketers only hire one company to perform retargeting?

When you’re conducting a test, you need to have only one variable. If you have multiple variables, then it’s difficult (and sometimes impossible) to know why you got your results, and that can be VERY frustrating! In the case of site retargeting, every vendor is going to target the same audience (people who have visited your site), and they are likely to have massive overlap on where inventory is purchased from. Thus, if two people are bidding on the same user on the same site, you are going to get confusing (and probably more expensive) results.

However, it is possible to have multiple retargeting campaigns running simultaneously as long as you follow these rules:

  1. Test them alone without other partners — or at least in an environment where they are the only variable — so that you know what effect the vendor is having on your overall campaign.
  2. If you have multiple vendors targeting the same audience, make absolutely certain that your vendors are buying that audience in different locations (e.g. FBX vs. ADX vs. AdNetworks).
  3. It’s fine to run different types of retargeting simultaneously because you are targeting different audiences. Just make sure you are not using multiple vendors to target the same audience.

With so many forms of advertising sending visitors and consumers to a given website, how can marketers understand and track the true value of targeted ads?

Don’t buy anything that you don’t understand. If you are being sold a product that cannot be explained to your full satisfaction, then don’t buy it! Use a sophisticated attribution model to measure what you’ve bought, and determine what works and what doesn’t. We’ve been running a free seminar for our clients called “Attribution Revolution” to help promote better attribution.

As retargeting matures, how will sub-segmenting audiences be used to more effectively reach the right consumers at the right time, and for the right price?

The vast majority of ad dollars still use content as a proxy for audience: Television remains vastly larger than any other form of advertising, and buying audiences on TV is still difficult. In this environment, marketers have a fixed price (GRP or gross rating point) that they are prepared to spend to reach an audience — effectively paying a different price for each buy but the same price for each individual within the buy. 

Believe it or not, a surprising number of people are still buying in real time using fixed bids. But the more sophisticated players compute the fair market value of each member of an audience in real time using variables such as audience characteristics, media location, advertisement type and our old favorites — reach and frequency — to determine what someone is worth. Figuring out what your customer is worth at every stage, and then working with internal and external partners to develop algorithms that work out how to bid on each different ad is the key. 

What trends in marketing/advertising do you find most interesting/exciting?

The evaporation of guesswork and its replacement with cold, hard facts.

One reason you love what you do: It changes human behavior.

Favorite ad: “The Most Interesting Man in the World.”

Must-read book: “Guns, Germs, and Steel.”

Connect with James on LinkedIn or follow @JamesANGreen.

Originally published on The Agency Post 4/9/13.

How Search Retargeting Is Bridging The Gap Between Search & Display

Harvard Business School recently published a working paper Do Display Ads Influence Search? Attribution and Dynamics in Online Advertising. The paper explores some key themes including:

  • How Search Retargeting Bridges The Gap Between Search & Display
  • How Search Retargeting Can Be Useful To Marketers In Making More Efficient Use Of Their Display Advertising Spend
  • How Search Retargeting Can Help Minimize The Risk Of Adjusting Spend In Each Of Those Two Categories

In the study, researchers found that “each $1 invested in display and search leads to a return of $1.24 for display and $1.75 for search ads.” As a result, there should be “an increase in search advertising budget share by up to 36%, followed by a commensurate reduction in display.”

However, the relationship between display ads and SEM is more complicated than the paper seems to suggest, and companies should be cautious when adjusting their media spend. Since display has an uplift effect on search conversions, shifting too many ad dollars away from display may adversely affect their SEM campaigns, consequently driving down acquisition through search conversion.

Search retargeting has the potential to bridge the display/search gap. Allocating a portion of current display advertising spend to a search retargeted campaign can allow marketers to see the display lift on search and use this information to spend more efficiently without risky adjustments to search and display budgets.

Although the findings of the Harvard study suggest that the solution to better performance and stronger ROI is shifting display dollars to search campaigns, search retargeting allows marketers to target display ads to consumers that are interested in their product or related products, and drive those consumers into the conversion funnel earlier.

Read the full article from Search Engine Land here! 

Facebook’s New RTB Ad Format #LIKE

Facebook’s pending release of Exchange-delivered ads to its News Feed has certainly caught the attention of marketers. While the new biddable media offering is currently in testing mode, the product will certainly have a positive ripple-effect throughout the real-time bidding (RTB) market once released.

Previously, the social network’s exchange ads were only available on the right-hand side of a users’ page – allowing advertisers to buy inventory in real-time and to leverage strategies like site and search retargeting within the Facebook environment. Facebook’s new ad-targeting capability improves upon this model, and will offer a more premium type of real-estate and slightly better creative from within the News Feed sections of user’s pages. The premium position of what Facebook has previously called “sponsored stories” serves as a huge leap forward for RTB, which has struggled to uncouple itself from the connotation of “remnant inventory.” With such a prime placement on the page, brand marketers are bound to climb aboard the RTB train (finally!). By attracting a wider range of advertisers and moving beyond a solely direct-response focused arena, many expect to see an overall boost in spend in the RTB space.

LBi’s head of media innovation Andrew Girdwood said display has “found its wings” because of RTB. “Search saved display – all the innovators in the display space saw how the biddable landscape worked in search and moved it into display,” he said. “The fact that Facebook is using exchange technology to put ads in such a prominent position will only accelerate advertisers’ interest in biddable media and RTB in general,” he added.

So, how will the new technology affect the user experience? Girdwood believes the impact will be minimal, as users are accustomed to Facebook experimenting and changing features. However, the move into the Newsfeed allows marketers to enter a space that has traditionally been “content” or geared towards more sponsored ad placements. However, irrelevant ads appearing in a person’s newsfeed could quickly spoil their acceptance of the new offering. When integrating with the new targeting capability, advertisers should have strategic solutions in place to ensure reasonable frequency capping and relevancy of in-feed ads.

At Magnetic, we think that the smart use of data will be everything for the success of Facebook exchange and latest ad unit – it will determine whether marketers add value to the Facebook experience or do more harm than good with their consumers. Either way, it shows that Facebook is just beginning to build momentum within its exchange and we suspect this is just the first of many more announcements and features to come.

The aftermath of Facebook’s extension will also be a source of observation for many other publishers, with regard to their own product offerings. LBi’s Head of Display Adam Russell said, “You can be sure if this works for Facebook and it can get the scale and do this without cannibalizing too much on its revenues and deprecating their CPMs, then you can imagine there will be other publishers wanting to make a similar move.”

Stay tuned for more updates and case studies on FBX and how newer ad formats fit into RTB.

 

 

Attribution Revolution Roadshow: Chicago

This past week, search retargeting leader Magnetic brought the Attribution Revolution Roadshow to Chicago. Attendees closed out the day with cocktails, hors d’oeuvres, and a lively panel discussion with some of the greatest minds in digital ad measurement.

The panel, which included industry experts from GoogleAdobeC3 Metrics and Adometry, provided a deep examination of the probing questions that surround media measurement in today’s digital age. Panelists shared insight as to how measurement varies across branding and direct response campaigns, which campaigns work more effectively for whom, and varying strategies of implementation and integration.

Moderating the panel—and bravely battling a cold—was Magnetic CEO James Green. The panelists, Jeremy King, Senior Product Manager for Analytics at Adobe, Paul Pellman, CEO of Adome try, Jeff Greenfield, COO & Co-Founder of C3 Metrics, and Stefan Schnabl, Product Manager at Google, began with an overview of the emerging methods of attribution, and the pros and cons of last-click attribution versus other multi-channel analytics platforms.

According to C3 Metrics and Adobe, a focus solely on the last-click attribution model may lead to inaccurate metrics. However, Google’s Stefan Schnabl argues that because of last-click, marketers know that there’s a huge part of the conversion funnel that hasn’t yet been looked at, which is where most of a company’s branding efforts will become visible.

Jeff Greenfield’s advice for reconciling the two methods?

“We still live in a last-click world, but you don’t need last click in order to make decisions. If you decide to stick with last-click, be smart about it. If you’re downloading raw data and then assigning credit after the fact because you don’t have a real-time platform like what [C3 metrics] or what Adometry offers, at least say: the average person takes 3 minutes to convert. I’m going to throw anyone out who jumped in at the last second to try to get that last-viewer, last-click credit.”

Despite any differing viewpoints, all parties stressed that, because it is difficult to tell how and where conversions actually happen, marketers need to closely examine their data both when developing attribution strategies, and when deciding what and how to integrate.

As James Green reminded the panelists and audience: “Half the challenge is cultural within an organization.”

Check out the video to hear the full debate!


Plugin by Social Author Bio